Print Page | Close Window

Unit Testing - Limitations of unit testing

Printed From: One Stop Testing
Category: Types Of Software Testing @ OneStopTesting
Forum Name: Unit Testing @ OneStopTesting
Forum Discription: Discuss All that is need to be known about Unit Software Testing and its Tools.
URL: http://forum.onestoptesting.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3604
Printed Date: 25Dec2024 at 2:00am


Topic: Unit Testing - Limitations of unit testing
Posted By: tanushree
Subject: Unit Testing - Limitations of unit testing
Date Posted: 12Nov2007 at 11:38pm
Unit Testing - Limitations of unit testing

Unit testing will not catch every error in the program. By definition, it only tests the functionality of the units themselves. Therefore, it will not catch integration errors, performance problems or any other system-wide issues. In addition, it may not be easy to anticipate all special cases of input the program unit under study may receive in reality. Unit testing is only effective if it is used in conjunction with other software testing activities.
It is unrealistic to test all possible input combinations for any non-trivial piece of software. Like all forms of software testing, unit tests can only show the presence of errors; it cannot show the absence of errors. To obtain the intended benefits from unit-testing, a rigorous sense of discipline is needed throughout the software development process. It is essential to keep careful records, not only of the tests that have been performed, but also of all changes that have been made to the source-code of this or any other unit in the software. Use of a version control system is essential; If a later version of the unit fails a particular test that it had previously passed, the version-control software can provide list of the source-code changes (if any) that have been applied to the unit since that time.



Replies:
Posted By: kalai
Date Posted: 24Jun2009 at 5:23am

Very infomatic. Testing cannot be expected to catch every error in the program - it is impossible to evaluate all execution paths for all but the most trivial programs. The same is true for unit testing. Additionally, by definition unit testing only tests the functionality of the units themselves. Therefore it will not catch integration errors, or broader system level errors (such as functions performed across multiple units, or non-functional test areas such as performance). Unit testing is more effective if it is used in conjunction with other software testing activities. Like all forms of software testing, unit tests can only show the presence of errors; it cannot show the absence of errors.

Software testing is a combinatorial problem. For example, every boolean decision statement requires at least two tests: one with an outcome of "true" and one with an outcome of "false". As a result, for every line of code written, programmers often need 3 to 5 lines of test code. This obviously takes time and its investment may not be worth the effort. There are also many problems that cannot easily be tested at all— for example those that are nondeterministic. In addition, writing code for a unit test is as likely to be buggy as the code it is testing. Fred Brooks in The Mythical Man-Month quotes never take two chronometers to sea. Always take one or three. Meaning, if two chronometers contradict, how do you know which one is correct?

To obtain the intended benefits from unit testing, a rigorous sense of discipline is needed throughout the software development process. It is essential to keep careful records not only of the tests that have been performed, but also of all changes that have been made to the source code of this or any other unit in the software. Use of a version control system is essential. If a later version of the unit fails a particular test that it had previously passed, the version-control software can provide a list of the source code changes (if any) that have been applied to the unit since that time.

It is also essential to implement a sustainable process for ensuring that test case failures are reviewed daily and addressed immediately. If such a process is not implemented and ingrained into the team's workflow, the application will evolve out of sync with the unit test suite ― increasing false positives and reducing the effectiveness of the test suite.

for more info... http://www.macrotesting.com - software testing world


Posted By: cprasenjit26
Date Posted: 23Jul2009 at 5:26am
Limitations of unit testing very well compiled to enable freshers to understand it easily.
------------------------------------------------
http://softwareqatestings.com - Software Testing



Print Page | Close Window