Performance tuning
Printed From: One Stop Testing
Category: Software Testing @ OneStopTesting
Forum Name: Versioning & Configuration Management @ OneStopTesting
Forum Discription: One Of The Biggest Problems in Product Developments where multiple Location, multiple Resources, and multiple Versions are very common.
URL: http://forum.onestoptesting.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=578
Printed Date: 23Dec2024 at 11:49pm
Topic: Performance tuning
Posted By: anushree
Subject: Performance tuning
Date Posted: 03Apr2007 at 2:42am
How to do performance tuning?
Performance tuning is the main activity associated with performance management. Reduced to its most basic level, tuning consists of finding and eliminating bottlenecks —
a condition that occurs, and is revealed, when a piece of hardware or
software in a server approaches the limits of its capacity.
Before starting the performance tuning cycle, you must do some
preparatory work that establishes the framework for ongoing performance
tuning activities. You should:
* Identify constraints — A
site's business case determines priorities, which in turn establish
boundaries. Constraints, such as maintainability and budget limits, are
unalterable factors in search of higher performance. You must focus
performance work on factors that are not constrained.
* Specify the load — This
involves determining what services the site's clients require and the
level of demand for those services. The most common metrics for
specifying load are the number of clients, client think time (the
amount of time between the receipt of a reply by a client and the
subsequent submission of a new request), and load distribution (steady
or fluctuating, average, and peak load).
* Set performance goals —
Performance goals must be explicit, which involves identifying the
metrics used for tuning as well as their corresponding benchmark
values. Total system throughput and response time are two common
metrics used to measure performance. After identifying the performance
metrics, you must establish quantifiable and reasonable benchmark
values for each one.
Note Because
performance and capacity are so closely related, the constraints, load,
and goals that you identify are also applicable to capacity planning.
After establishing the boundaries and expectations for performance
tuning, you can begin the tuning cycle, which is an iterative series of
controlled performance experiments.
The Tuning Cycle
Repeat the four phases of the tuning cycle shown below until you
achieve the performance goals that you established prior to starting
the tuning process.
Tuning Cycle
Collecting
The Collecting phase is the starting point of any tuning exercise.
During this phase, you are simply gathering data with the collection of
performance counters that you have chosen for a specific part of the
system. These counters could be for the network, the server, or the
back-end database.
Regardless of the part of the system you are tuning, you require a
baseline measurement against which to compare performance changes. You
need to establish a pattern of system behavior when the system is
idling as well as when the system is executing specific tasks.
Therefore, you can use your first data-gathering pass to establish a
baseline set of values for the system's behavior. The baseline
establishes the typical counter values that you would expect to see
when the system is behaving satisfactorily.
Note Baseline
performance is a subjective standard — you must set a baseline that
is appropriate for your work environment and that best reflects your
system's workload and service demands.
Analyzing
After you have collected the performance data that you require for
tuning the selected part of the system, you need to analyze the data to
determine bottlenecks. Remember, a performance number is only an
indicator ac it does not necessarily identify the actual bottleneck
because you can trace a performance problem back to multiple sources.
It is also common for problems in one system component to result from
problems in another component. A memory shortage is the best example of
this; it is indicated by increased disk and processor use.
The following points, taken from the Microsoft Windows 2000
Resource Kit, provide guidelines for interpreting counter values and
eliminating false or misleading data that might cause you to set
inappropriate target values for tuning.
* Monitoring processes of the same name ac
Watch for unusually large values for one instance and not the other.
Sometimes, the System Monitor misrepresents data for separate instances
of processes with the same name by reporting the combined values of the
instances as the value of a single instance. You can work around this
by tracking processes by the process identifier.
* Monitoring several threads ac
When you are monitoring several threads and one of them stops, the data
for one thread might appear to be reported for another. This is because
of the way threads are numbered. You can get around this by including
the thread identifiers of the process's threads in your log or display.
Use the Thread/Thread ID counter for this purpose.
* Intermittent spikes in data values ac
Do not give too much weight to occasional spikes in data. These might
be due to the startup of a process and are not an accurate reflection
of counter values for that process over time. Counters that average, in
particular, can cause the effect of spikes to linger over time.
* Monitoring over an extended period ac
We recommend using graphs instead of reports or histograms because the
latter views only show the last values and averages. As a result, you
might not get an accurate picture of values when you are looking for
spikes.
* Excluding start-up events ac
Unless you have a specific reason for including start-up events in your
data, exclude these events because the temporarily high values they
produce tend to skew overall performance results.
* Zero values or missing data ac Investigate all occurrences of zero values or missing data. These
can hamper your ability to establish a meaningful baseline.
Configuring
After you have collected your data and completed the analysis of the
results, you can determine which part of the system is the best
candidate for a configuration change and implement this change.
The cardinal rule for implementing changes is: implement only one
configuration change at a time. A problem that appears to relate to a
single component might be the result of bottlenecks involving several
components. For this reason it is important to address problems
individually. If you make multiple changes simultaneously, it may be
impossible to accurately assess the impact of each change.
Testing
After implementing a configuration change, you must complete the
appropriate level of testing to determine the impact of the change on
the system that you are tuning. At this point, it is a matter of
determining whether or not the change:
* Improved performance ac Did the change improve performance, and if so, by how much?
* Degraded performance ac Did the change cause a bottleneck somewhere else?
* Had no impact on performance ac Did the change have any noticeable impact at all on performance?
If you are lucky and performance improves to the anticipated level, you
can quit. If not, you must step through the tuning cycle again.
Tip You
can obtain the monitoring results produced by your testing from
monitoring log files ac which are exportable to Microsoft Excel and the Event log.
When testing, be sure to:
* Check the correctness and performance
of the application that you are using for testing by looking for memory
leaks and inordinate delays in response to client requests.
|
|