Manual vs. Automated

Some writers believe that http://www.answers.com/topic/test-automation - test automation is so expensive relative to its value that it should be used sparingly. Others, such as advocates of http://www.answers.com/topic/agile-software-development - agile development , recommend automating 100% of all tests. A challenge with automation is that automated testing requires automated test oracles (an oracle is a mechanism or principle by which a problem in the software can be recognized). Such tools have value in load testing software (by signing on to an application with hundreds or thousands of instances simultaneously), or in checking for intermittent errors in software. The success of automated software testing depends on complete and comprehensive test planning. Software development strategies such as http://www.answers.com/topic/test-driven-development - test-driven development are highly compatible with the idea of devoting a large part of an organization's testing resources to automated testing. Many large software organizations perform automated testing. Some have developed their own automated testing environments specifically for internal development, and not for resale.