Hi,
Because manual test script creation is, well, manual, organizations
may not realize all of the benefits of manual test scripting in today's
short development cycles. Typically, testing staffs use Excel
spreadsheets (or, less typically, Word tables) to record testing steps,
expected results, and pass/fail state in the required timeframes. They
compile the results of testing either manually or with homegrown
programs that import the Excel spreadsheets or Word tables, process the
test results, and then produce reports.
But anyone attempting to use Excel spreadsheets or Word tables to manage manual test scripts will run into these problems:
- The need to constantly scroll horizontally and vertically makes these methods inefficient and difficult to use.
- The
typically wide formats of Excel spreadsheets or Word tables and the
need to reproduce headings on each page make it difficult to print
reports.
- It's hard to organize scripts by grouping testing steps.
- There's no standard way to identify expected results within test scripts.
- There's no standard way to report test results.
- It's hard or impossible to reuse test script lines or groups of lines in different test scripts.
A
tool that solves these problems would enable test departments to take
full advantage of their enlightened decision to incorporate manual test
scripts into the application development process.
------------- Thanks & regards
Lokananth
http://www.mioot.com/ - Live Chat Software By miOOt
|