Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin


 One Stop Testing ForumTypes Of Software Testing @ OneStopTestingPerformance & Load Testing @ OneStopTesting

Message Icon Topic: Looking for website testing tools

Post Reply Post New Topic
Author Message
Ragini_02
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 04May2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Quote Ragini_02 Replybullet Topic: Looking for website testing tools
    Posted: 04May2007 at 4:52am
Since you mention load, stress, and load balancing you are talking about performance tools and this depends on how robust you want your performance testing to be. What is the "best" should mean what is the best for your company. And a lot of this, for me anyway, depends on two factors:

1.) What is your testing methodology going to be (especially with respect to performance testing)?

2.) Are you also buying a functional testing tool? (WinRunner, SilkTest, Visual Test, SQA Robot, etc.)

Mercury's LoadRunner is very good if you want to construct very quick tests and run them without a great deal of performance model or workload characterization analysis. LoadRunner is not very good at simulating different access methods (i.e., modems) nor is it capable of altering these within a single scenario. LoadRunner is good if you want to supplement it with third party tools that help you gather metrics for various performance models. Handles iterations pacing and user staging very well (especially with 6.0). Licensing is a bear with this, however, depending on how it will be used. Transaction breakdowns and drill-down procedures are only minimally present. Good network delay monitoring (if you license it).

Segue's SilkPerformer is much better from a robust performance testing angle - but the learning curve might be considered a little higher. It is much more capable of multiple access methods as well as treating staged iterations as individual users. SilkPerformer can be used for quick one-off tests just as LoadRunner can but it has the benefit (in my opinion) of allowing for much more robust performance modeling scenarios. Licensing is pretty decent but still expensive. Good transaction breakdown but not always the best drill-down scenarios.

Rational has a series of tools (one of which is LoadTest) that is pretty good and offers excellent drill-down and transaction breakdowns. About on par, in my opinion, with SilkPerformer overall.

Each of these has a scripting language (with Segue's being, by far the most robust, but with more of a possible learning curve). LoadRunner's internal scripting language is probably the weakest. You can also look at companies like RadView with WebLoad and RSW Software with eLoad. They all have their fine points but it depends on what type of testing you want to do and how detailed your testing is going to be. It also depends on how much and to what degree you will rely on other third party tools.




Post Resume: Click here to Upload your Resume & Apply for Jobs

IP IP Logged
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 4.109 seconds.
Vyom is an ISO 9001:2000 Certified Organization

© Vyom Technosoft Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
Job Interview Questions | Placement Papers | Free SMS | Freshers Jobs | MBA Forum | Learn SAP | Web Hosting