Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search Help | |
Register Login |
One Stop Testing Forum : Types Of Software Testing @ OneStopTesting : Web Testing @ OneStopTesting |
Topic: web metrics/standards |
|
Author | Message |
Romila_luv
Newbie Joined: 02May2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
Topic: web metrics/standards Posted: 02May2007 at 3:52am |
Being the 'experienced web' tester on my current project i've been
slated to come up with a set of metrics and standards that our web app
needs to meet. such as page load times, commiting data to the database,
and performing searchs. Basically a whole bunch of quantifiable
standards for actions to be performed by the web app. Are there any web
sites that discuss these topics and gives suggestions of timming
standards. I already tried the w3c's website a few others but really
havent had any luck in finding the data in need. I'd apperciate any
suggestions.
Post Resume: Click here to Upload your Resume & Apply for Jobs |
|
IP Logged | |
Sansita
Newbie Joined: 02May2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
Posted: 02May2007 at 4:19am |
For me I have never been a fan of the term "non-functional requirements." To me they are quality requirements and thus do answer to functionality, particularly when you consider that a better way to discuss functionality is in terms of behavior. (That is why functional testing is, to me, better called behavioral testing.) That said, I think the user community as a whole does force a certain set of constraints regarding what will be tolerated. On the other hand, most organizations do not know those figures and it is up to QA to make sure those are known in the form of valid metrics or SLAs. Also some requirements of standards cannot come from the user community because they do not have the implicit knowledge to state those requirements. (That is why so many products are rejected by customers saying, "Yes, this is what I asked for but not what I wanted.") In general, timings are based on the work of neuropsychology which tells us the perceptual limits of how people work with things such as Web applications. The best statement of this based on much empirical evidence is the 0.1/1/10 rule. However, as we all discussed in another post, those "rules" have to be taken in context of the page itself and what is going on contextually relative to the user tasks. Also some W3C standards, such as the WAI Guidelines, would most likely not come from your users but rather from sound development practices; something that the users are abstracted away from. Users do not care how you built it, they care if it works. So a customer may say, "Make sure people with disabilities can use this Web site" but they would not be able to specify how to go about doing that. Granted, that last example speaks more to functional requirements but, by that logic, so does all timing information. Also remember that even by the definition of "non-functional requirements" that many people use, one aspect of that is "cost requirements" and that is generally not going to come from your user community. That is going to be internal to the organization. |
|
IP Logged | |
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
© Vyom Technosoft Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.